About Me

Name: AusTex
Location: Austin, TX
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

A Detour Back to Liberty

Give me liberty or give me death
vs.
Tell me that you love me, and I will accept servitude
"Give me liberty or give me Death," Patrick Henry's famous 1775 'sound bite', exemplifies the indominatable spirit of our Anglo / Western heritage. The concept was not new. Several hundred years earlier, in 1305, William Wallace refused subjugation to the English crown and, for his pursuit of freedom, gave his life in a particularly gruesome execution. In 1775 Benjamin Franklin said "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." John Witherspoon (Princeton's president starting 1768) rallied the religious to the revolutionary cause with his 1774 Thoughts on American Liberty and in his pastoral letter (that year, I believe) to all the Presbyterian churches in the colonies, saying with regard to Britian's racheting up regulations and taxes that he preferred: "war with all its horrors, and even extermination, to slavery, rivited on us and our posterity."
 
These pioneers of liberty chose life of spirit, an existance not chained by man, over life under another man's chains. Said in other words, I chose a life of liberty over a life of slavery. [fn1]
 
Now in 2009, in crystal contrast, political power in the USA is centered on individuals' acceptance of servitude, and even the pursuit of servitude - giving it and taking it, which is truly a perversion of the self-evident liberties. I don't have discrete examples from history of people giving up liberty in exchange for servitude, but no doubt they exist. And inclusion of examples is necessary to personalize servitude's insidious dearth, so please forgive the absence, for now. That exchange appears to result from an unwillingness to fight or accept responsibility for liberty.
 
Nevertheless, those who would rather exist as slaves, accept subjugation, or otherwise eschew liberty, must follow a different philosophy. A philosophy that the current Democrats exploit. A philosophy that the current Democrats nurture with so-called 'entitlements' and words of empathy. That is the philosophy that justifies eroding the liberties of those who would fight, even to extinction, rather than exist as slaves, accept subjugation, or exchew liberty. An examination of the many aspects of each philosophy and their interplay must wait til another time. Suffice it to say that liberty is to be glorified and pursued, for its virtues have been proven. Equally clear, slavery is not admirable - as to masters and as to slaves (being or having been a slave is neither meritorious nor virtuous as a philosophical matter) - and must be exterminated, especially from the perspective of the slave.[fn2] Accomplishment of that objective rests in exposing the slavery philosophy for the morbid state it occupies in human concept, from both perspectives: that of master and that of slave.
 
fn1 - Christian religion is an integral component, if for no other reason than as a vaccine to narcicism and self worship. But religion also a topic that deserves separate treatment. Generally, it appears man has compulsions to servitude and compulsions to dominate. One can serve God, thus satisfying the subjugation compulsion through a spiritual outlet and avoiding acting it out in subjugation to man. One can control his existance by living with individual liberty, thus satisfying the domination compulsion in both a spiritual sense and with worldly acts, without having to dominate or enslave others.
 
fn2 - politicians exploit people and create slaves in part by extending sympathies and empathies to those whose craving for human affection and love (scarce commodities in a narcicistic world of arrogant self worshipers) make them vulnerable to such false offerings
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Freedom Worth Dying For, Change Worth Believing In, and the Obama Irony

Freedom Worth Dying For, Change Worth Believing In, and the Obama Irony

John Witherspoon was, perhaps, one of the most influential and visionary proponents of the American Revolution, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and a tireless contributing architect of the post-revolution government. His 250 year old vision and sense of moral philosophy are not only relevant today, they might well be as critical to a new birth of the American Dream as they were to the original birth in the mid eighteenth century. The idea of freedom was fundamental to Witherspoon’s philosophy. Our young President and the members of Congress should take heed.

Witherspoon was, beginning in 1768, the sixth president and head professor of a small Presbyterian college in Princeton, New Jersey. Yes, that’s the one that flourished into one of the world’s finest universities. I submit Princeton University grew to international prominence singularly from the seeds of John Witherspoon’s leadership. Witherspoon modeled the curriculum on his own alma maters, the University of Edinburgh and the University of St. Andrews. 1 He built on an idea of one of Princeton’s Ulster Scot founders, Samuel Blair, that the curriculum should “cherish a spirit of liberty and free enquiry.” 2 The studies were difficult, to say the least, beginning with a year and a half of Latin and Greek and included “massive doses of reading” of the classics, moral philosophy, and rhetoric and criticism, as well as of the (then) modern philosophers. 3

Particularly striking and, again, relevant today were Witherspoon’s words (circa 1774) in a pastoral letter to all of the Presbyterian churches in the colonies saying that he preferred “war with all its horrors, and even extermination, to slavery riveted on us and our posterity.” 4 The rivets to which he referred were the British Parliament’s policies to tax and regulate the affairs of the American Colonies. For Witherspoon, war, with all its horrors, and even extermination, were better than continued submission to the British government’s policies. Witherspoon equated life under the British rule to slavery and argued for liberty, instead. Did he also inspire Patrick Henry, whose maxim “Give me liberty or give me death” is famous to this day?
Now, the United States is locked in a philosophical battle, much more so than an economic one. The cumulative amount of taxes, the federal debt, and the almost wholly pervasive government regulation of daily lives are, I argue, more oppressive than what the American colonists endured. The current economic difficulties merely illustrate government policies that not only enslave the producers of society with taxes and rules and mammoth debt, but also enslave the vast majority of welfare recipients with the misery of perpetual non-production. The synergy of the two creates an accelerating spiral to moral death, the real crisis in the USA.

And therein lie a couple of staggering ironies. The promised and hoped-for “change we can believe in” has been peddled, but change has not occurred. Oh, President Obama surely is a change from President Bush. But so are the socks I am wearing today a change from the socks I wore yesterday. Believable and sustainable change must be a turn to moral values based on freedom, industry and self-determination, not to massive increases in government subjugation of the rich and the poor.

President Obama is not in the slightest manner attempting to change the immoral philosophy of tax and spend and oppress with unhinged regulation and un-payable debt. Instead, the current administration’s imposition of even more such oppression binds us ever more; it takes away freedom, discourages industry, and supplants self-determination. As a consequence, slavery in the sense verbalized by John Witherspoon is being imposed. And from that springs the biggest irony. Our country’s first President of African descent, as master of the most massive increase of governmental economic and regulatory domination in the country’s history, is enslaving us all for generations to come.

D N Walker
Austin, Texas
March 6, 2009

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »