About Me

Name: AusTex
Location: Austin, TX
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The real reason President Obama bows to foreign leaders

A while back, President Obama bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia.  His bow was disturbing because it demeaned the office of the President of the United States of America.  As the president continues to bow to foreign leaders, most recently to the emperor of Japan, a different and more serious reason has become evident.

I fear President Obama has prostrate cancer.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The main reason for the failure of President Obama's foreign policy failures

By now, the essentially universal failure of President Obama's foreign policies is evident.  There is no progress in stopping or even slowing Iran's advance toward making a nuclear bomb.  More like an accelertion, and Iran's shuck and jive about shipping fuel to France and Russia for enrichment.  No progress toward Middle East peace.  More like increasing ossification of the various factions' attitudes.  No progress toward a global climate initiative in Copenhagen.  More like going back to the drawing board from Mr. Obama's promise of a Copenhagen accord.  As so aptly put on a recent WSJ editorial page, countries like China and India do not have the massochistic fervor to harm their economies for the sake of the USA's climate neuroses.  The list goes on.  Even as the President of the United States of America bows to the king of Saudi Arabia and the emperor of Japan and heaps appeasements on our enemies and insults on our allies.  (Sadly, I fear Mr. Obama has prostrate cancer!)
 
How can this be; why has the rest of the world not submitted to the brilliance of Mr. Obama?  He is, after all, a charismatic and historic American, the first man of color elected to be President of the United States.  The answer is easy enough.  The main reason is the rest of the world is not a product of the United States government's education system.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GM To Repay U.S. Early - Best Laugh of the Day

It was a guffaw more than a laugh, when I saw today's MSNBC headline: "GM posts loss, set to repay U.S. early."  And then I remembered the earlier headline about the White House (President Obama) considering using unspent TARP or stimulus money to pay down some of the national debt.  Ah, there is precedent.  Nevertheless, both are inane.
 
The story that GM posted a loss, only $1.2 billion for the last 3 months, was ordinary.  No surprise, there.  But its announced plan to pay back taxpayer money while it's gushing red ink was a hoot.  Kind of like paying off one credit card with another one - and I didn't make that up.  In fact, the story reports: "But the money will come from funds loaned by the Government."  So GM will be paying a loan from the U.S. taxpayers with money from another loan from the U.S. taxpayers.  Can you say "good money after bad," or "shell game?"  But then, it's not that different from taking Peter's social security monies to pay Paul's Obamacare or other welfare entitlements.  Both involve funny money and neither involves cash or an actual debt payoff.  Well, pardon me, there is the payoff to the auto unions.  Isn't it just more of our Democrats' financial policy of spending trillions of dollars you don't have.  Dollars that go to unions and other special interest groups, and to the Chinese. 
 
Carrying the humor to its logical extreme as he often brilliantly does, Rush Limbaugh quipped to the effect: Why doesn't President Obama just pay off the entire national debt?!  He can just write a check.  That was hilarious.  Except for the fact that such nonsense actually appears to fit within the current Democrats' frame of mind.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama - The Billy Mays of Politics

 President Obama, selling all the time.  By now, everyone knows the mediawaves are saturated with Mr. Obama.  And that the President is constantly hawking Obamacare.  That, as we also know, is just what Billy Mays does.  Yes, their styles are different, but their MO is the same - to convince people to buy the product.  That is why Barack Obama is the Billy Mays of politics.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama - Change You Can Bereave In

Where does one start?  Easy.  First the definition of bereaved:  "suffering the death of a loved one."  A loved one can be a person or a principle.  It goes without saying that the bereavement of a loved one's death is serious to all sane people.  It should go without saying that we also recognize a larger love, the love of liberty.
 
Love of liberty is the common love in the United States of America.  A love greater than life itself to those such as Patrick Henry and John Witherspoon and other founding fathers, whose passion for liberty and leadership changed the world's concept of government.  Their example and the change they believed in was honored then and later by so many freedom lovers who gave and risked their lives to maintain freedom against the tyranny of many political rulers.  
 
Now, we are facing another change, a different change that is moving away from the love liberty.  A change led by President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.  Another change in the concept of government, which could lead to liberty's death.  We must not suffer the bereavement of a death of liberty.  How are we changing away from liberty?
 
Obamacare is one example that includes both a person's death and the death of a principle.  There are the projected deaths of our friends and family prematurely from the highly charged and highly effective "death panel."  The term death panel is literally a stretch since the health care bills don't use it, but the rhetoric certainly is reasonable.  Because USA government health care certainly will be rationed as it is in the government health care systems in other countries.  A government bureaucracy, a panel, will prescribe the rationing.  And the rationing will result in premature deaths as well as suffering prolonged by waiting one's turn to see the doctor. 
 
Not that President Obama will be solely responsible for the death of liberty.  He is the leader of the pack, though.  And apparently he embraces the change away from liberty.  A change founded on the principle that a few elected office holders can, should, must, dictate the people's actions, attitudes and even thoughts, and control everyone's lives.  Control through government-run health care, home mortgages, banking, investment banking, student loans, to name a few.   We must remember a vote or an election is not a relinquishment of liberty  Nevertheless, we all have responsibility for liberty's lingering death march in a parade of horribles. 
 
What is most toxic to freedom has to be dishonesty and corruption - an absence of truth.  Remember the verse from the Book of John:  "You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." And the passage in, what is it, Revelations, about the false prophets.  Samuel Adams knew the importance of truth and virtue:  "If Virtue & Knowledge are diffused among the People, they will never be enslav'd."  [Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, February 12, 1779].
 
Our national dept is a major inhibitor of freedom.  Such a huge obligation to others must me seen as a huge limit on freedom.  The Democrats' lust for growing the national debt with huge annual deficits is astounding.
 
And there's neglect.  Too many of us just don't get involved in a myriad of issues for as many reasons.  How else, for example, could so many Acorn workers have become so cruelly immoral except under the darkness of neglect, an absence of the light of transparency that is enabled by virtuous people not bothering to learn what is going on.  But the audacity of killing liberty has awakened a new generation of freedom fighters.  Not just James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles.  But also tens of thousands of ordinary citrizens whose participation in the twentieth century's tea parties marks an epiphany of sorts. Our freedoms depend on a rebirth of the passion of liberty.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Do Barack Obama and Susan Boyle Have In Common?

The lyrics of the song from Les Miserables, her singing of which made Susan famous.

The miraculous illumination of Susan Boyle to the world stage might not be purely haphazard.

Think about this: the third verse of the song is:

But the tigers come at night,
With their voices soft as thunder,
As they tear your hope apart,
And turn your dreams to shame.

Susan Boyle wonderfully exposed those thoughts to all of us.  By way of melodious lyrics, in a captivating manner.

So what does that have to do with Our President?  I've concluded Barack Obama is the master tiger. His actions are tearing apart the hope of responsible and productive Americans. The philosophy of Obama's policies' is such as will turn the American dream to shame.

Specifically, the goals and consequences of "national health care", "cap and trade", "redistribution of wealth" (through the "stimulus" and budget spendings), and many more policies are antithetical to the American Dream. They are antithetical to Dr. Martin Luther King's Dream. And, at this time - the "green age" - they are not sustainable.  (one attribute that, alone, discloses they are wrong)

As the words and actions of the false prophet are false, so too are the upside down, backwards, and just flat wrong (in terms of nurturement of a moral human spirit) policies of the Obama administration.
Shame on you, President Obama!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Will Nominee Sotomayor Become Pres. Obama's Harriet Miers?

President Obama continues to lengthen his string of go-along-with-Bush policies, which include Gitmo tribunals and non-closure, Patriot Act surveillances, TARP bailout - quadrippled at least, etc.  Now with his nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, Pres. Obama has out-Bushed Pres. Bush's nomination of Harriet Miers.
 
Ms. Miers also has a compelling personal story.  She was considered, however, to be somewhat of a lightweight, lacking intellectual rigor, especially in the heady realm of constitutional law and Supreme Court land.  And Ms. Miers did not,  gasp,  attend an Ivy League law school.  But her accomplishments, especially in the male-dominated world of big law firms (and more especially during the 1970's, 80's and 90's), outshine those of Judge Sotomayor.  Even her intellectual acumen appears to best that of Judge Soto's, based on a comparison of their public utterances.
 
Even against the odds as tilted by the Obama loving media, could Judge Sotomayor become Pres. Obama's Harriet Miers?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Freedom Worth Dying For, Change Worth Believing In, and the Obama Irony

Freedom Worth Dying For, Change Worth Believing In, and the Obama Irony

John Witherspoon was, perhaps, one of the most influential and visionary proponents of the American Revolution, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and a tireless contributing architect of the post-revolution government. His 250 year old vision and sense of moral philosophy are not only relevant today, they might well be as critical to a new birth of the American Dream as they were to the original birth in the mid eighteenth century. The idea of freedom was fundamental to Witherspoon’s philosophy. Our young President and the members of Congress should take heed.

Witherspoon was, beginning in 1768, the sixth president and head professor of a small Presbyterian college in Princeton, New Jersey. Yes, that’s the one that flourished into one of the world’s finest universities. I submit Princeton University grew to international prominence singularly from the seeds of John Witherspoon’s leadership. Witherspoon modeled the curriculum on his own alma maters, the University of Edinburgh and the University of St. Andrews. 1 He built on an idea of one of Princeton’s Ulster Scot founders, Samuel Blair, that the curriculum should “cherish a spirit of liberty and free enquiry.” 2 The studies were difficult, to say the least, beginning with a year and a half of Latin and Greek and included “massive doses of reading” of the classics, moral philosophy, and rhetoric and criticism, as well as of the (then) modern philosophers. 3

Particularly striking and, again, relevant today were Witherspoon’s words (circa 1774) in a pastoral letter to all of the Presbyterian churches in the colonies saying that he preferred “war with all its horrors, and even extermination, to slavery riveted on us and our posterity.” 4 The rivets to which he referred were the British Parliament’s policies to tax and regulate the affairs of the American Colonies. For Witherspoon, war, with all its horrors, and even extermination, were better than continued submission to the British government’s policies. Witherspoon equated life under the British rule to slavery and argued for liberty, instead. Did he also inspire Patrick Henry, whose maxim “Give me liberty or give me death” is famous to this day?
Now, the United States is locked in a philosophical battle, much more so than an economic one. The cumulative amount of taxes, the federal debt, and the almost wholly pervasive government regulation of daily lives are, I argue, more oppressive than what the American colonists endured. The current economic difficulties merely illustrate government policies that not only enslave the producers of society with taxes and rules and mammoth debt, but also enslave the vast majority of welfare recipients with the misery of perpetual non-production. The synergy of the two creates an accelerating spiral to moral death, the real crisis in the USA.

And therein lie a couple of staggering ironies. The promised and hoped-for “change we can believe in” has been peddled, but change has not occurred. Oh, President Obama surely is a change from President Bush. But so are the socks I am wearing today a change from the socks I wore yesterday. Believable and sustainable change must be a turn to moral values based on freedom, industry and self-determination, not to massive increases in government subjugation of the rich and the poor.

President Obama is not in the slightest manner attempting to change the immoral philosophy of tax and spend and oppress with unhinged regulation and un-payable debt. Instead, the current administration’s imposition of even more such oppression binds us ever more; it takes away freedom, discourages industry, and supplants self-determination. As a consequence, slavery in the sense verbalized by John Witherspoon is being imposed. And from that springs the biggest irony. Our country’s first President of African descent, as master of the most massive increase of governmental economic and regulatory domination in the country’s history, is enslaving us all for generations to come.

D N Walker
Austin, Texas
March 6, 2009

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »